From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 25 00:42:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E5F1A5 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55808FC0C for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAP0fp7k072223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:41:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <50B1694C.8010600@tundraware.com> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:41:48 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready? References: <50B0F80B.6090400@tundraware.com> <50B10185.2010500@bnrlabs.com> <50B105AE.4050008@tundraware.com> <50B16353.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <50B16353.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:41:51 -0600 (CST) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: qAP0fp7k072223 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:42:00 -0000 On 11/24/2012 06:16 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 25/11/2012 04:06, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> But I have had essentially no problems doing in-place major rev >> updates with FreeBSD thus far. The only breakage I am worried about >> now is whether the new compiler change breaks things that used to >> work just fine. For example, will my make.conf settings be properly >> observed by the new tool chain? > > > If you want to build with clang wait for 9.1 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=threads/165173 I plan to stay conservative and only switch to clang when it is THE way to build everything. i.e., When GCC is finally retired for use in the base OS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/