Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:46:35 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Chad David <davidc@acns.ab.ca>
Cc:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man7 tuning.7
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011206174402.21187Q-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011206154216.A94670@colnta.acns.ab.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Chad David wrote:

> How is something like this?  It isn't quite as broken out as it could
> be, mostly because I tried to use as much of the original text as
> possible.  I have fixed a few spelling mistakes etc. but it still needs
> work.  I did add a litte text around the keepalive section. 
> 
> The question I struggled with while putting this together was do we
> group by system (disk, memory, network etc.), or do we group by tunable
> section (filesystem layout etc., sysctl's and tunables, kernel config,
> etc.)?  Now that I've gone through it all, I think it should be
> structured more like was suggested then how I updated it.  By trying to
> group it by tunable section I ended up with some data spread all over
> the file. 

I think the proposed strategy of sorting by topic may be the best
approach--in a sense, I don't care so much about the vehicle by which I
optimize performance, as the effect of the optimization, or how it relates
to a problem I've identified.

> Another question was if we wanted to maintain Matt's informal tone? 
> Some terms like "network suds" give the manual a more playful feeling
> which I tried not to kill (although I did change a lot of 'I's to
> 'we's). 

I cleaned up a little of that in my recent commits, and I suspect
continuing to move gradually in the direction of formalism might be a good
thing.  But maybe I'm old and dusty.  One of the concerns I did have was
about the "currency" of the information: for example, the manpage advises
the reader not to use IDE tagged stuff.  It should probably qualify such
statements with "at the time this document was written".  These statements
have a tendency to get old fast, and not get updated for long periods of
time.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
robert@fledge.watson.org      NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011206174402.21187Q-100000>