From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Oct  5  7:41:16 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.184.128])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D973537B503
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Oct 2000 07:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e95EfEM10249;
	Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:41:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from lowell)
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: running X on 4.1.1
References: <000001c02ed2$e4742280$0200a8c0@rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au>
From: Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com>
Date: 05 Oct 2000 10:41:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: rnera@optushome.com.au's message of "5 Oct 2000 14:49:44 +0200"
Message-ID: <44ya03wdth.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

rnera@optushome.com.au (Ryan Nera) writes:

> I've just installed 4.1.1 and selected the highest level of security
> 
> In rc.conf
> 
> The kernelsecuritylevel is set to 2 and turned ON
> 
> I've been having problems getting X to start with this level of security...
> basically I cant run X
> 
> My questions can I have this High level of security and still be able to run
> X windows on my system?

You can run X before you raise the securelevel.

X servers require direct access to system memory, which is a feature
that obviously isn't compatible with the concept of high
securelevels.  


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message