From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 01:16:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A73316A41A for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bitabyss@gmail.com) Received: from cartman.xxiii.com (cartman.xxiii.com [208.62.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2506D13C461 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bitabyss@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.23] (adsl-068-209-177-221.sip.ard.bellsouth.net [68.209.177.221]) by cartman.xxiii.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBE1Gsfw004835 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:16:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bitabyss@gmail.com) Message-ID: <4761D98F.9010906@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:17:03 -0500 From: Rob User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20071214010542.GA19553@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20071214010542.GA19553@demeter.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:16:56 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > I ran across this today: > http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/ > Title: Csh Programming Considered Harmful > I wonder what responses I might get here, and how much of this applies to > tcsh as well (I'm still not exactly a tcsh expert). If you really want to troll, there's a "unix haters handbook" available as a pdf out there (stw) -R