Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:20:05 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris H <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <20150210232005.GW29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:13:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:38:54 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> = wrote >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for= that > > I want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove th= e old > > make from base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > Please note; I am not expressing any objection to it's removal. > But would a 30-day window not be a more friendly. So as to better > accommodate those whom will need to make the/a transition? >=20 What transition, since 10.0 noone have fmake by default anymore? if one wan= t to keep using fmake he has to explicitly state it when building. Not that I'm against a 30-day windows but that does not seems worth it. Best regards, Bapt --L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTakiUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ewx6ACglQ89WgR+Z4IUxkNVqpX74ocB 874AnRLjn6Ic4AjVdFtI0uct7kdSRu27 =RUMM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150210232005.GW29891>