Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 20:05:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> Cc: Rich Bud <rbud@fortean.com>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd sig 10 under stable Message-ID: <15586.63409.158555.954798@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020515235351.GO4401@cicely5.cicely.de> References: <20020515160407.T28044-100000@nemesis.fortean.com> <15586.55082.170680.378288@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020515235351.GO4401@cicely5.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernd Walter writes: > Sounds like the most likely reason - especially considering BWX. > I will check out how much work it is to expand our trap.c NetBSD already does it. Lucky they do, otherwise I would have messed up the sign extension avoidance. Anyway, I just comitted it to -current. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15586.63409.158555.954798>