From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Oct 6 0:17:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4EB37B405; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 00:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from notebook.vega.com (h56.229.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.229.56]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02458; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 10:17:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 10:17:25 +0300 (EEST) Message-Id: <200110060717.KAA02458@ipcard.iptcom.net> To: kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp, wjv@FreeBSD.org Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Sobolev Subject: Re: USE_LIBTOOL breakage in freebsd.port.mk X-Mailer: Pygmy (v0.5.11) In-Reply-To: <7m1ykhl40i.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 14:41:01 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:26:41 +0000 (UTC), > Johann Visagie wrote: > > > > Attached is a patch for bsd.port.mk to work around the problem. Comments? > > It seems my problem on net-snmp (4.2.2-pre*) can be solved with this > patch. > > Portmgr, is there a problem if I commit this patch? Please don't do that. Due to number of ports infected with USE_LIBTOOL this patch should be extensively tested on the bento first. In the meantime you can workarround the problem by replacing USE_LIBTOOL with GNU_CONFIGURE and adding a small patch, which prevents .la files from being installed (for example see ports/textproc/libxml/files/patch-ltmain.sh). -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message