Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:49:57 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast Message-ID: <86sm1c154q.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20050425160146.4795fe1b.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> <20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424210422.03d22990@64.7.153.2> <20050425014453.GA59981@xor.obsecurity.org> <426C6B1D.3040704@elischer.org> <20050425061459.GA33247@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425062106.GB91852@voodoo.oberon.net> <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org> <20050425160146.4795fe1b.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> writes: > Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > > What about the deprecated language constructs in 4.0? > According to http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html, some of the > deprecated constructs are not even valid C [...] *none* of the deprecated constructs are valid C. This does not mean they aren't in widespread use. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sm1c154q.fsf>