Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:09:20 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libypclnt Makefile Message-ID: <20020418170920.B99972@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <xzphem88v9w.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:03:07AM %2B0200 References: <20020418192213.GW24261@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <200204181620.g3IGKIu51885@freefall.freebsd.org> <200204182117.g3ILHIx08776@harmony.village.org> <xzphem88v9w.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I tried hard to not respond to this... but you want to make way too many unsubstantiated claims in public... On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:03:07AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > To add insult to injury, he did send out a "heads-up" about > the commit, but half an hour *after* the fact. Revisionist history. I asked you 3 days *before* the commit. http://people.freebsd.org/~obrien/libypclnt-Makefile.mbox > I replied, thinking he > expected feedback, and offered a compromise solution. When I > discovered that he had already made the commit, however, I took it as > a clear indication that he was not interested in anything I have to > say about the matter, but only in "being right" or "winning". Feh. You stated something as "fact", I replied it was opinion (you disagreed it was "debatable" -- all can see the archives): From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Message-ID: <xzp4ri9ottx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Single-line lists makes adding files much more > > difficult, > That is a matter of opinion. No, it is not. It is a fact. At that point I could tell pleasing you was going to be difficult, and *invited you* to please make the changes you wanted WRT your line file per line as that would be easier on both of us: And I will back out your back out. Changing what I committed to something simular to other FreeBSD Makefiles is what you should do. I guess there are instances of what you have above, so if that is really what you want to do, I guess you should do that. But I will not do it, as you did not speak up before and I don't want to have 5 rounds of review to find something you won't "back out". > My intent with backing out his commit was to bring us back to square one > so we could discuss this properly before deciding on a solution. Your intent was to break the committer guidelines and commonly accepted "best practices" of putting on the breaks once it was clear we were in the middle of controversy. > David claims that listing multiple files on a single line does not READ my words -- I DO NOT CARE. > the style I currently use (which is based on the style used in the > ports tree) after one too many merge conflicts caused by listing The Ports tree does NOT use: SYM<tab>= SYM<tab>+=<tab><tab>VAL To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020418170920.B99972>