Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:12:20 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Nagios & Jail
Message-ID:  <20090106160922.B45399@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090106160333.GA99388@obspm.fr>
References:  <20081217210542.GA25347@obspm.fr> <20081218172218.GE3080@home.opsec.eu> <20090106145716.GE94159@obspm.fr> <20090106150352.B45399@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20090106160333.GA99388@obspm.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0-494945514-1231258340=:45399
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Albert Shih wrote:

> Le 06/01/2009 =E0 15:06:37+0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb a =E9crit
>> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Albert Shih wrote:
>>
>>> In fact I found the problem :
>>>
>>> When I compile nagios-plugin ports in a jail the =ABconfigure=BB don't =
find
>>> syntax of ping :
>>>
>>> checking for ping... /sbin/ping
>>> checking for ping6... /sbin/ping6
>>> checking for ICMP ping syntax... configure: WARNING: unable to find usa=
ble ping syntax
>>>
>>> But if I compile the same ports in a =ABnormal=BB server (both are amd6=
4).
>>>
>>> checking for ping... /sbin/ping
>>> checking for ping6... /sbin/ping6
>>> checking for ICMP ping syntax... /sbin/ping -n -c %d %s
>>> checking for ICMPv6 ping syntax... /sbin/ping6 -n -c %d %s
>>>
>>> So if I use the check_ping produce by compiling in a no-jail server on =
a
>>> jail-server it's working.
>>>
>>> I think it's a bug about the nagios-plugins ports. What you think ?
>>
>> I think most of all configure stuff out there is ... ok, if you
>> compile the port inside a jail and permit raw sockets, does it work
>> then --
>> either by using the rc.conf option and restarting the jail with
>> rc.d/jail or using sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=3D1  ?
>
> You mean I MUST restart the jail after I change the sysctl value ? Becaus=
e
> after I change it, I can make a ping from inside the jail without
> restarting the jail.
>
> Well I'm going to make a new jail to check that (all other jail is in
> production).

No, if you manually change the sysctl it's all fine and production
immediately.

If you change the option .. wait; my fault, raw sockets is not
supported by the rc framework in contrast to other things, so there is
no option there. I confused this with jail_socket_unixiproute_only in
which case just changing it in rc.conf would not be sufficient.

/bz

--=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb                      The greatest risk is not taking one.
--0-494945514-1231258340=:45399--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090106160922.B45399>