From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 18 17:51:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA20312 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 17:51:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ics.com (ics.com [140.186.40.192]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA20296; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 17:51:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kaleb@ics.com) Received: from sunoco (sunoco.ics.com [140.186.40.142]) by ics.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with SMTP id UAA07073; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 20:51:09 -0500 (EST) From: Kaleb Keithley Received: by sunoco (SMI-8.6/Spike-2.1) id UAA29625; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 20:51:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 20:51:08 -0500 Message-Id: <199811190151.UAA29625@sunoco> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Linksys NIC, was: Re: de ethernet driver -- another puzzle Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks to hints from Wilco Bulte, Scott Gasch, and Martin ???, plus a few printfs sprinkled liberally about .../pci/if_de.c, I've determined that this particular Linksys EtherPCI LAN Card II that I have wants the ed0 driver, not the de0 driver as the Handbook and FAQ suggest. I also now know why the de probe doesn't print out a message when the probe fails. Which is not to say that I think that's good. On the contrary, I think it's bad. C'est la vie. Anyway, the Handbook and FAQ should be updated. Thanks again for the help. -- Kaleb S. KEITHLEY To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message