From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 15:24:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEFC16A4CE; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:24:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailer.nec-labs.com (mailer.nec-labs.com [138.15.108.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84E043D1D; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:24:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bohra@cs.rutgers.edu) Received: from [138.15.108.135] ([138.15.108.135] unverified) by mailer.nec-labs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:24:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4123749B.2090101@cs.rutgers.edu> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:24:11 -0400 From: Aniruddha Bohra User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: drhodus@machdep.com References: <200408160104.03708.chris@behanna.org> <200408181611.45299.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2004 15:24:11.0630 (UTC) FILETIME=[69B3C0E0:01C48537] cc: Roman Kurakin cc: chris@behanna.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:24:14 -0000 Could this please be moved to -chat or something. Current has too much traffic as it is :( Thanks Aniruddha David Rhodus wrote: >On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:11:44 +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > >>On Wednesday 18 August 2004 15:28, David Rhodus wrote: >> >> >>>On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin >>> >>> >>wrote: >> >> >>>>I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness. >>>>I'd rather call it open development. >>>> >>>>rik >>>> >>>> >>>Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the >>>development work going on. Thats what started this thread in the >>>first place. >>> >>> >>This is ludicrous. You don't have access to my private source trees on >>my private machines where I test and develop software before committing >>it to CVS. How does that change the fact that when I commit that >>software it has a standard two clause BSD open source license. >> >> > >Well that is fine if that is the method in which you are using the >perforce system. But when overly large commits hit the cvs tree from >perforce which should have came with incremental changes so there >could be more detail public scrutiny, etc.. there is a problem. > > >