From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 18 11:27:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA23896 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA23891 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id LAA09872 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 11:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA23302; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 21:22:03 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 21:22:03 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: dennis cc: Nate Williams , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...) In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970418121536.00b52b60@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, dennis wrote: > At 09:22 AM 4/18/97 -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > >> Why is this "annoucement" such a big secret? Are you just not sure > >> yet? You complain about no commercial vendors not being interested in > >> FreeBSD, and then you give us this horsecrap about "wait 90 days for > >> the big unveiling..." > > > >You've obviously never dealt with other commercial vendors before. > >Right now as we speak my company is waiting with baited breath for two > >companies (Symantec and IONA) to release their next products, which are > >*critical* to our future success, since the # of bugs and missing > >features in the current crop make it useless for long-term success. All > >attempts to let us know *IF* our bugs are fixed, whether or not new > >features that exist in other vendors products, and anything that will > >help us to make decisions are not told. > > > >This is *common* with all organizations, at least with FreeBSD you get > >*hints* as to what's coming down the pike by looking at commit messages, > >with commercial companies you cross your fingers and hope for the best. > > Freebsd is *not* a commercial company and there is no benefit to secrecy. > Why does a "free" OS have secrets? And this is not about fixing bugs, > believe me I understand about bugs, its about having to reengineer > freebsd based systems every couple of months..... Well, a free OS may not have sectrets (besides those you can find out about in the source) but those participating in developing it, especially different commercial bodies do have secrets. Just speculating: if some company (be it BSDI, Digital, the little green aliens from the Mars or somebody wholly different) wants to contribute something to FreeBSD, yet have it not be known to the larger publicity (to avoid rumors, out of time queries, etc.) before it is ready they certainly should have the right. The same holds true if somebody is working on a commercial, obj linkable SMP support for FreeBSD. Sander NB! I talk only for myself and anything presented above is to the best of my knowledge only speculation - especialy the part about the aliens :-) > > I'm just getting tired of getting hit in the nuts for not supporting > -current....the fact that the release is out of date a week after its > out is a very bad thing and really needs to change... > > Dennis > >