Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:46:01 +0100 From: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 135937 for review Message-ID: <47BEC409.8020406@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <200802220422.m1M4MFI5035030@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200802220422.m1M4MFI5035030@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Change 135937 by marcel@marcel_xcllnt on 2008/02/22 04:21:47 > > Unify <machine/hid.h> > > Fork the conflicting HID0_TBEN into HID0_AIM_TBEN > and HID0_BOOKE_TBEN. Renbame the e500-specific > defines to include _BOOKE. > > None of these were actually used. > Just to clarify: HID regs (and their fields) are vendor-specific (Freescale) and not present on other Book-E compliant systems, for example, PPC440 do not have them, so I think those defines should rather keep reference to E500, 74XX and so on. We can straighten this out at some later stage: as we talked earlier, there's more areas (pmap to name the most important) that assume E500 and would not run on other Book-E variations OOTB right now. There's a bit of work involved to make this port more generic/layered, and I have it on my TODO list. Rafal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47BEC409.8020406>