From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 16:02:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E73F1065689 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A948FC1F for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2008 11:02:09 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.3-GA) with ESMTP id KKR69809; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:02:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2008 11:02:08 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18711.2431.464472.977892@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:02:07 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20081109152835.N49145@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <50261.1226194851@people.net.au> <20081109152835.N49145@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: UFS2 limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:02:10 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: > the limit is 32765, just because link count is 2 bytes wide and > each subdir adds two to base directory. you have to change to 2 > level hierarchy. Question (for anyone who has an informed opinion): If there any technical reason that couldn't be expanded to 32 bits? Or is it possible but not done for historical or policy reasons, and if so what are they? Robert Huff