Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 23:54:20 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, apache@freebsd.org, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Clean up www/mod_extract_forwarded Message-ID: <AANLkTim30NMnD5opklxeUxk9tpMWd4VEWs78zrr_L6Wv@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201005122253.o4CMrFx6088257@frieza.p6m7g8.net> References: <201005122253.o4CMrFx6088257@frieza.p6m7g8.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/5/13 Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@freebsd.org>:
> Bring port dirs/names into 'standards'
> www/mod_extract_forwarded -> www/mod_extract_forwarded2
> www/mod_extract_forwarded_ap13 -> www/mod_extract_forwarded
>
> These are 'repo' moves not copies (both destinations exist already in other states)
Yes, they are non-standard names. But we already have
mod_extract_forwarded2 port, which is
forked from old mod_extract_forwarded and have different codeset.
What should we do with this situation?
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
<kuriyama@s2factory.co.jp> // S2 Factory, Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim30NMnD5opklxeUxk9tpMWd4VEWs78zrr_L6Wv>