Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 04:37:22 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/acpica OsdEnvironment.c acpi_machdep.c acpi_wakeup.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 autoconf.c critical.c dump_machdep.c elf_machdep.c exception.s genassym.c identcpu.c initcpu.c legacy.c locore.s machdep.c mem.c nexus.c pmap.c ... Message-ID: <xzpllxr5r4t.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200305010105.h4115Q0s052875@repoman.freebsd.org> (Peter Wemm's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:05:26 -0700 (PDT)") References: <200305010105.h4115Q0s052875@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> writes: > - I have tried to minimize looking at the NetBSD code, except in a couple > of places (eg: to find which register they use to replace the trashed > %rcx register in the syscall instruction). As a result, there is not a > lot of similarity. I did look at NetBSD a few times while debugging to > get some ideas about what I might have done wrong in my first attempt. Any particular reason why you wanted to avoid using NetBSD code? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpllxr5r4t.fsf>