From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 22:50:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB59210656E6 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6D98FC13 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1MMoTaF066613; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:50:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n1MMKtiS066327; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:20:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:20:55 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Junsuk Shin In-Reply-To: <7873ac110902221044hfd96a8cn5b32e0f90edca212@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090222232034.O66317@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <7873ac110902211146k6a8ee7d0pd67edc559ed14b15@mail.gmail.com> <20090221235530.C60480@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <7873ac110902221044hfd96a8cn5b32e0f90edca212@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: read two files simultaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:50:33 -0000 > That's true. Using bigger buffer will help, but it doesn't tell why reading > large size file is slower than reading small size file. > really slower? or just bigger difference with large files? > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> I'm just guessing inode structure, the physical file location on HDD >>> might be related to this. But, if I read only one file, the size >>> doesn't matter. Reading file (10M, 100M, 700M) gives constantly about >>> 70MB/s, and the weird thing happens when I read 2 files of big size. >>> >> >> if you use O_DIRECT it's read from disk exactly as you specified, without >> readahead, so you do a lot of seeks. >> >> simply use bigger buffer like 1MB >> > > > > -- > Junsuk >