From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 10:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B812106564A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4AA8FC15 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5JA0Qnl034441 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5JA0Qn4034439; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:00:26 GMT Message-Id: <201206191000.q5JA0Qn4034439@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/158686: [vimage] [tap] [patch] Add VIMAGE support to if_tap X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:00:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/158686; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" To: Daan Vreeken Cc: Mikolaj Golub , bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/158686: [vimage] [tap] [patch] Add VIMAGE support to if_tap Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:52:59 +0400 > I don't have a working test setup or use case at this moment where we use > multiple FIBs in combination with tap(4), but if I remember correctly, the > kernel would instantly panic upon receiving the first packet through the > interface without the call to M_SETFIB(). It is quite strange since M_SETFIB does nothing more than setting 4 bits in mbuf flags which are zero by default (fib 0). > > If I run in to this again I'll submit a separate PR for this problem. Can you please drop e-mail to me if this happens?