Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:35:05 +0100
From:      Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
To:        Charles Howse <chowse@charter.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unusual logcheck entry
Message-ID:  <20031009133505.GD32124@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <005d01c38e5f$36fbba10$04fea8c0@moe>
References:  <20031009105138.GC7709@rot13.obsecurity.org> <005d01c38e5f$36fbba10$04fea8c0@moe>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:16:45AM -0500, Charles Howse wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:43:31AM -0500, Charles Howse wrote:
> > > The following appeared in /var/log/messages in my daily=20
> > logcheck report:
> > >=20
> > > Oct  8 20:38:47 curly rpc.statd: invalid hostname to sm_stat:
> > >=20
> > ^X???^X???^Z???^Z???%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%8x%62716x%hn%5185
> > 9x%hnM-^PM

	<snip>

> > > At that time, I was sitting on the couch watching the Cubs play the
> > > Marlins.
> > > Any idea what this means?
> >=20
> > This is an attempt to exploit an old Linux rpc.statd
> > vulnerability..see the mailing list archives for extensive discussion
> > a few years ago.
>=20
> OK, I got some good info from the archives.
> I realize this is a harmless attack if running FBSD.
> I also realize that I shouldn't be running rpc on an interface facing
> the internet.
> For various reasons, this server is outside my hardware firewall, and
> I'm not interested in configuring a software firewall.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks to me like rpc.statd is related
> (at least) to NFS.
> I've placed the line "nfs_server_flags=3D"-h 192.168.254.2" in my
> /etc/rc.conf, and rebooted.
> I've also edited /etc/ssh/sshd_config, and told it to listen only on
> 192.168.254.2, and not allow root logins.
> Am I now protected from this attack? (note rpc.stat lines below)

You were anyway; this never affected FreeBSD.

However, I'd also add portmap_flags=3D"-h 192.168.254.2" to your rc.conf
if I were you.  I'd also reconsider the decision not to run a firewall.

Ceri
--=20

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/hWQIocfcwTS3JF8RAiH4AKC3Y30Joi6WSxExQeN3Y2IcFvyRsACdHsoG
nRWoJHYJBC5O93iEQDX8TaE=
=GEbC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031009133505.GD32124>