From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 07:12:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883DA16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:12:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556FB43D2F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:12:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim) id 1B3zCD-000891-00 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:12:33 +0100 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:12:33 +0100 To: FreeBSD-mobile@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040318151233.GT28592@poupinou.org> References: <74EC3F3BA88A824FA61D3FD88097DB821915EF@ITIServer03.iti> <20040311180557.GB78217@www.lambertfam.org> <20040313000147.GQ28592@poupinou.org> <1079517975.10165.0.camel@localhost> <20040317192650.GB41487@www.lambertfam.org> <20040317202916.GA5235@trimind.de> <20040317211359.GB53072@www.lambertfam.org> <20040317220838.GA5647@trimind.de> <20040317221529.GD53072@www.lambertfam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317221529.GD53072@www.lambertfam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Bruno Ducrot Subject: Re: PowerNow in mobile AthlonXP X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:12:34 -0000 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:15:29PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote: > In retrieve_conf_from_bios(), try changing : > for (i = 0; i < psb->numpst; i++) { > to: > for (i = 0; i < psb->numpst * 2 ; i++) { > > On my laptop the matching entry is at i = 16 even though > psb->numpst = 14. > After looking more your report, I have a theory: I think that originaly the OEM do have designed the board in order to ship an AthlonXP-M model 8. After that, they used an AthlonXP-M model 10 instead, but "forgot" to update the Performance State Block in order to get the correct number of Performance State Tables that the BIOS contains. I will see how to handle that. Thank, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.