Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:18:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: dmm125@bellatlantic.net, mike@smith.net.au, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD equiv. of /proc/loadavg Message-ID: <199807022118.QAA06797@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <199807021850.LAA01417@antipodes.cdrom.com> (message from Mike Smith on Thu, 02 Jul 1998 11:50:04 -0700) References: <199807021850.LAA01417@antipodes.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I realize now though that if you want to port some apps with >> low-level details, you gotta do a little reworking. > Yup. Particularly when you're dealing with code written for Linux > (where NIH is considered a virtue...). What's NIH? Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807022118.QAA06797>