Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:02:03 +0200
From:      Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org>
To:        RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: parental control with squid and dansguardian
Message-ID:  <468E9FBB.5070507@boosten.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070706205813.162eef64@gumby.homeunix.com.>
References:  <468E6BE2.3010203@slightlystrange.org>	<24bb2a0d0d4ebbfb6c86b9cc566e8145@szalbot.homedns.org>	<20070706204358.15bd7730@gumby.homeunix.com.>	<468E9C5F.8020709@boosten.org> <20070706205813.162eef64@gumby.homeunix.com.>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:47:43 +0200
> Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> wrote:
> 
>> RW wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
>>> Zbigniew Szalbot <zbigniew@szalbot.homedns.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it
>>>> is perfect solution as no client configuration is needed and no
>>>> escaping possible! Thanks again!
>>>
>>> Unless they reconfigure their browser to use one of the numerous
>>> free proxy servers.
>> The answer to that problem is quite easy: deny all direct access to
>> the internet on your gateway.
> 
> In which case there isn't much point in transparent proxying because
> the browser will need to use the proxy for https and FTP.

Correct. That said OP probably doesn't have to configure hundreds of
home PCs, so no need for transparent proxying.

Peter
-- 
http://www.boosten.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?468E9FBB.5070507>