From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 11:40:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABAB16A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:40:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (esemetz.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142A643D5C for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:40:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregorynou@altern.org) Received: from smtp.metz.supelec.fr (smtp.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.205]) by esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id iA4BeD500713 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:40:13 +0100 Received: from [193.48.225.2] (nou.rez-metz.supelec.fr [193.48.225.2]) by smtp.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iA4Bmmg29540 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:48:48 +0100 From: Gregory Nou To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Message-Id: <1099568402.722.8.camel@alfred> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 12:40:03 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: smbfs and kldload X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:40:32 -0000 Hi, here is my (kind of) problem. At school, we are forced to backup our docs (e.g. java code and tex reports) on a windows server. So I always did it with smbclient. But now, I would love to do it with mount_smbfs, since I think it would be easier (read more pratical) But I compiled it statically (as I'm not sure it's the proper way to express it : it's not a module, it's in my kernel) Then, this happens : # mount_smbfs //login@school's.server.samba/my_account /mnt/disque_u mount_smbfs: kldload(smbfs): File exists zsh: exit 71 mount_smbfs //login@school's.server.samba/my_account I looked at the man and at google, and did find people experiencing the same pb with vfsload instead of kldload, but no fix. So my question is : do I need to recompile a kernel w/o smbfs and then load it as a module, or is there another solution ? thx for reading this -- Grégory Nou