From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Mar 21 03:13:36 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA19750
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 03:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA19745
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 03:13:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id DAA05923; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 03:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 03:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603211113.DAA05923@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: sanpei@yy.cs.keio.ac.jp
CC: ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199603210842.RAA01461@lavender.yy.cs.keio.ac.jp> (sanpei@yy.cs.keio.ac.jp)
Subject: Re: ported WIDE dhcp to FreeBSD 2.1R
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 *   I send next mail at Jan., 22, 1996. But there were no mail from
 * ports team.
 * 
 *   What is the matter with you?

It has been imported to our tree on the next day by Paul Traina, one
of our chief importers.  I assumed he'd already notified you, sorry
for the lacking response.

By the way, I'm thinking of renaming it to "net/wide-dhcp" since there 
now exists a "net/isc-dhcp" port.  Is that ok for you?

Satoshi
-------
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 04:31:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Traina <pst@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: cvs commit: ports/net/dhcp - Imported sources

pst         96/01/23 04:31:16

  Branch:      net/dhcp  1.1.1
  Log:
  Port of WIDE DHCP v1.3 to FreeBSD 2.x.
  
  Status:
  
  Vendor Tag:	WIDE
  Release Tags:	v1_3
  
  N ports/net/dhcp/Makefile
  N ports/net/dhcp/files/md5
  N ports/net/dhcp/patches/patch-aa
  N ports/net/dhcp/pkg/PLIST
  N ports/net/dhcp/pkg/COMMENT
  N ports/net/dhcp/pkg/DESCR
  
  No conflicts created by this import