Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:19:09 -0700 From: Wim Lewis <wiml@omnigroup.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Naming a locally-built version of a package Message-ID: <37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9@omnigroup.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a particular recommended practice for naming a locally-built = package that is built with a local patch, or different configure = options, etc., so that it works well with the rest of the package = system, particularly dependencies and things? Ideally: let's say I'm building a custom version of Foo-1.3. I'd like to = name it such that: - Existing packages that require Foo will be satisfied by my patched = Foo - Local packages which require my patched Foo can specify a = dependency on it Less important but nice: - pkg audit will still recognize my Foo as Foo and inform me of = things I should know - The system won't suggest to "upgrade" my Foo to a non-patched Foo = of a later version=20 Is this (or a subset) possible with pkgng?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9>