From owner-freebsd-current Sat Sep 5 13:08:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA05993 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 13:08:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA05988 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 13:08:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA13775; Sat, 5 Sep 1998 22:01:31 +0200 (CEST) To: Chuck Robey cc: Eivind Eklund , Andre Oppermann , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: 3.0 enters BETA status in 12 days! In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 05 Sep 1998 14:37:17 EDT." Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 22:01:31 +0200 Message-ID: <13773.905025691@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I just checked Kirk's posts about it, and Andre falls into a hole >between where Kirk did and didn't specify. > >He said private, non-coomercial was free. > >He said companies that package it and sell it embedded should pay, and >that included ISPs, but there the example was ISPs who put a machine at >a customer's site. > >As far as ISPs using it themselves, it's unclear. Kirk gave an example >of someone at work using on their workstation, and he said that was >free. I'd guess Eivind's right, you'd have to check it with Kirk >McKusick. But if an ISP deploys it on all their servers it is not free. Kirks rates for such cases are very reasonable. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message