Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 05 Jul 2018 09:10:54 -0700
From:      Ravi Pokala <rpokala@freebsd.org>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>, <src-committers@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r335979 - in head: . lib/libkvm sys/kern sys/netinet sys/sys usr.bin/netstat usr.bin/sockstat
Message-ID:  <A607A367-329C-4627-84E8-0C4D16C8085D@panasas.com>
In-Reply-To: <201807051313.w65DDnQJ041281@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201807051313.w65DDnQJ041281@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Brooks,

-----Original Message-----
From: <owner-src-committers@freebsd.org> on behalf of Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>
Date: 2018-07-05, Thursday at 06:13
To: <src-committers@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject: svn commit: r335979 - in head: . lib/libkvm sys/kern sys/netinet sys/sys usr.bin/netstat usr.bin/sockstat

> Author: brooks
> Date: Thu Jul  5 13:13:48 2018
> New Revision: 335979
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/335979
> 
> Log:
>   Make struct xinpcb and friends word-size independent.
>   
>   Replace size_t members with ksize_t (uint64_t) and pointer members
>   (never used as pointers in userspace, but instead as unique
>   idenitifiers) with kvaddr_t (uint64_t). This makes the structs
>   identical between 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs.
...
> Modified: head/UPDATING
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/UPDATING	Thu Jul  5 11:50:59 2018	(r335978)
> +++ head/UPDATING	Thu Jul  5 13:13:48 2018	(r335979)
> @@ -31,6 +31,14 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 12.x IS SLOW:
>  	disable the most expensive debugging functionality run
>  	"ln -s 'abort:false,junk:false' /etc/malloc.conf".)
>  
> +20180705:
> +	The ABI of syscalls used by management tools like sockstat and
> +	netstat has been broken to allow 32-bit binaries to work on
> +	64-bit kernels without modification.

Isn't that what the compat32 layer is for?

> These programs will need
> +	to match the kernel in order to function.  External programs may
> +	require minor modifications to accommodate a change of type in
> +	structures from pointers to 64-bit virtual addresses.
> +

Doesn't this contradict the earlier statement about letting things run unmodified?

Thanks,

Ravi (rpokala@)





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A607A367-329C-4627-84E8-0C4D16C8085D>