Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:20:55 +0200
From:      Volker Stolz <stolz@I2.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
To:        Peter Stapley <pstapley@rapidnet.com>
Cc:        Volker Stolz <stolz@I2.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SMP Problems
Message-ID:  <20000910132055.B6131@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <001601c01a97$3fc2f8a0$aa0b22d0@ihatejim.net>; from pstapley@rapidnet.com on Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 01:50:46PM -0600
References:  <200009091901.NAA68271@rapidnet.com> <20000909210324.A3912@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <001601c01a97$3fc2f8a0$aa0b22d0@ihatejim.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Peter Stapley wrote:
> SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
> 
> Isn't this bad? Should I see two CPU's launched?

[This time sent to the list, too]
No, note that CPU #0 has been running in the first place.
Invoke some processes and use "top" to see processes getting scheduled
to different CPUs.
-- 
Volker Stolz * stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de * PGP + S/MIME


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000910132055.B6131>