From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 16 10:02:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645D616A4CE
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:02:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [195.9.45.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C244843D49
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:02:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru)
Received: (qmail 60709 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2005 10:02:24 -0000
Received: from cicuta.babolo.ru (194.135.49.133)
  by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 16 Mar 2005 10:02:24 -0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 2804 invoked by uid 136);
	Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:02:41 -0000
X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1
In-Reply-To: <20050315135749.A92893@ganymede.hub.org>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:02:41 +0300 (MSK)
From: "."@babolo.ru
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <1110967361.940194.2803.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
cc: dima <_pppp@mail.ru>
cc: "."@babolo.ru
cc: net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: High ping latency using two ethernet under FreeBSD 4.11
	...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:02:27 -0000

> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 .@babolo.ru wrote:
> 
> >> but didn't think this was doable ...
> > Why not:
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.254/32 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.251/32 alias
> > ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.244/32 alias
> > so on
> > ?
> > With the only fxp0 interface
> Great ... I have a new server going down next week that I'll try out the 
> ng_fec stuff with, and the above, then ... thanks ...
If addresses and not bandwidth is reason, no need for ng_fec.

> > You can freely add or delete all /32 addresses
> > while not 200.46.204.2 and 200.46.208.2
> That's cool, since those IPs are just for the base server itself, and 
> never get removed ...