From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 2 2:46:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB7C337B72C for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 1951 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Apr 2001 09:45:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:45:05 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Port startup scripts configuration data - /etc/rc.conf? Message-ID: <20010402124505.G462@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Neil Blakey-Milner , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20010319111737.B515@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010402122940.F462@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010402114259.E44609@rapier.smartspace.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010402114259.E44609@rapier.smartspace.co.za>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:42:59AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:42:59AM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Mon 2001-04-02 (12:29), Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Absolutely no opinions? :) I gather, then, that it would not be considered > > a Bad Thing (tm) to do ports configs that way? :) > > It's ok, but it'll need a change for 5.x sometime soon too, if my > prescience is correct. (: You mean the NetBSD rc.d/ thing? Weeell.. wouldn't source_rc_confs still work? Please please please make it still work! ;) G'luck, Peter -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message