Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:28:12 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Patrick Hess <patrickhess@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Let pkg upgrade packages that were installed from binary only? Message-ID: <86a8sool6b.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <7254888.Ivp9dgZRl1@desk8.phess.net> (Patrick Hess's message of "Wed, 09 Sep 2015 23:24:59 %2B0200") References: <55EEA459.1050304@shopzeus.com> <7254888.Ivp9dgZRl1@desk8.phess.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Patrick" =3D=3D Patrick Hess <patrickhess@gmx.net> writes: Patrick> Nagy L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3 Zsolt wrote: >> So is there a way to tell "pkg" that it should not automatically install= =20 >> dependencies from packages that were installed from the ports tree? Patrick> You can use "pkg lock ..." to tell pkg(8) not to mess with the pac= kages Patrick> that you want to compile yourself from the ports tree. You can still run in to dependency hell that way. The moment you start setting non-default options, the best way I've found is setting up poudriere. It's amazingly easy once you get the hang of it, and you can do a "build" without breaking your current installation until it builds clean. --=20 Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. Still trying to think of something clever for the fourth line of this .sig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86a8sool6b.fsf>