From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 02:11:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B5614FAE2E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6837269E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E26A014FAE2D; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02E614FAE2C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCC77269A for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3EE2276 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M2BgJk094562 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M2BglX094558 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|FreeBSD does not reply to |FreeBSD does not reply to |ICMP requests when assigned |ICMP requests when assigned |a Class-E address |a 240.0.0.0/8 --- Comment #4 from Rodney W. Grimes --- The name class E was abolished in 2002 when RFC3330 designated 240/4 as reserved and referenced rfc1700, which is STD 2, that reference appears to = be for the 255.255.255.255 limited broadcast address. I have removed the obsolete name "class E" from the title of this bug and u= sed the current "240/4" designtation. (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #2) I do not have a serious problem with this patch, but would like to know we = are not just doing this at someones request without further reasons than "someo= ne is playing with it." --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=