From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 12 14:47:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2E31065675 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13938FC1E for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 72P41h0071bwxycA12njnD; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:43 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([67.180.84.87]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 72nc1h00g1t3BNj8e2nd68; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:37 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 034A9102C36; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:47:44 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20110712144744.GA53733@icarus.home.lan> References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, George Sanders Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes... X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:46 -0000 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:06:04PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > > On what exact OS version? ?Please don't say "8.2", need to know > > 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what. ?You said "8.x" above, which is too > > vague. ?If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at all, > > and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either. > > We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE.... Are you referring to the > difference between RELENG_8_2 and RELENG_8_2_0_RELEASE? I was referring to someone coming along saying "I'm running 8.2", which isn't accurate enough these days. More specifically, I was referring to the fact that some people are running RELENG_8 (presently known as 8.2-STABLE), while others are running RELENG_8_2 (presently known as 8.2-RELEASE). Yes I'm aware of RELENG_8_2_0_RELEASE, but I don't go that far. I stick with what shows up in src/examples/cvsup/*-supfile, and what's listed on the releng/ page: http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ Let's get back on the subject of the OP's issue please. :-) -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |