From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 7 19:34:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FBE1065673 for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it) Received: from cp-out1.libero.it (cp-out1.libero.it [212.52.84.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF508FC0A for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it) Received: from libero.it (192.168.17.15) by cp-out1.libero.it (8.5.107) id 4A2BA96900036351; Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:54 +0200 Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:53 +0200 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "barbara" To: "freebsd-ports" X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.3 (R1) (B3pl25) X-SenderIP: 87.21.195.155 Cc: bsam Subject: [x11/nvidia-driver] conflicts with linux dri ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:34:56 -0000 > Hi! > > > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and > other linux dri ports to be in conflict. > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace > libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it right to > mark this port and other linux dri ports to be in conflict? Why it's not good? I'm not sure I've understood, but I think it's more or less the same with= the native counterpart: if you install x11/nvidia-driver, libGL.so from = graphics/libGL get replaced (actually renamed).