Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:25:11 -0700 From: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r239568 - head/etc/rc.d Message-ID: <20120822222511.GD78670@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <50355121.3070408@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208221835.q7MIZI77076855@svn.freebsd.org> <50355121.3070408@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:37:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Were these changes discussed somewhere and I missed it? They were not discussed. I did not see the need. This is simple functionality. If securelevel is raised > 0, one cannot start up a firewall nor make major changes to time. Thus these components are required to be done before raising securelevel. > I'm not opposed per se, but the security aspects should be discussed on > freebsd-security@, I'm sorry, I didn't feel that ensuring the software follows the published specification of its functionality to have such a security aspect. > and it's preferable that significant changes to > rcorder be looked at on freebsd-rc@ as well. I don't consider this to be a significant change. I do have some significant changes that I do want freebsd-rc@ to review I will be sending soon. > Can you hold off on MFC'ing any of this until it's been reviewed more > thoroughly? Yes. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120822222511.GD78670>