From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 30 20:23:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A776416B0F9; Tue, 30 May 2006 20:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B3143D8E; Tue, 30 May 2006 20:23:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4UKN4Ua071561; Wed, 31 May 2006 00:23:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 00:23:04 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20060530200425.GA16937@soaustin.net> Message-ID: <20060531001204.O69922@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <200605301910.k4UJAIMw054372@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060530232844.W69922@mp2.macomnet.net> <20060530193804.GH29390@kaiser.sig11.org> <20060530235134.I69922@mp2.macomnet.net> <20060530200425.GA16937@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Matteo Riondato , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/recoverdisk Makefile recoverdisk.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:23:46 -0000 On Tue, 30 May 2006, 15:04-0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:53:50PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > That's something new for me. Mark, is it possible to mail them to > > freebsd-bugs as well? > > Not easily possible (it just mails to the default assignee). Further, I'm > not sure that increasing the traffic on -bugs even _more_ is advisable, it's > pretty near impossible to drink from the firehose as it is. > > If people see things on -${ARCH} that should be in 'kern' they should fix > them up. I don't subscribe to those lists and thus don't often work on > those PR (just once every month or so; to work on the -i386 PRs takes some, > er, liquid courage to go tackle.) Categories are ofter misfilled and sometimes bugs in the PRs are arch independent. As far as I see a volume of non-i386 bugs is not big: at the moment we have 22 sparc64, 100+ amd64, 3 ia64, 3 powerpc, 13 alpha PRs. Arm is bugless. On the other hand it not feasible to subscribe to all our arches lists just to get PRs. -- Maxim Konovalov