Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:03:32 +0200
From:      Matthijs Breemans <matthijs@groov.nl>
To:        Gabriel Dragffy <gabe@dragffy.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why is sendmail in the core of FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <bf7c8c65f7bed6930afd32b66995b5aa@steak.groov.nl>
In-Reply-To: <6CBE22B2-206F-4695-889F-5630E6B9399C@dragffy.com>
References:  <6CBE22B2-206F-4695-889F-5630E6B9399C@dragffy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Sendmail does its job for sending usermail, postfix or exim would be
overkill for that.

Just my 0.02 tho

Matthijs

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:55:51 +0100, Gabriel Dragffy <gabe@dragffy.com>
wrote:
> Just been wondering about this. If you do a standard install of
> FreeBSD it includes things such as a basic FTP daemon, all the
> various utilities such as df, ls, etc. SSHD etc. I assum these are
> all in FreeBSDs core, as developed in the same CVS repo. Having read
> the mails on this list for several weeks it seems obvious that most
> people regard Postfix or EXIM to be the best MTAs, so I'm wondering
> why is sendmail the MTA that is integral to FreeBSD? Wouldn't it be
> ace to have the default one be Postfix or something?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Gabe
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bf7c8c65f7bed6930afd32b66995b5aa>