From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 8 19: 0:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (dhcp244.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.244]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A136237B681 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:00:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eA935W900472; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 19:05:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200011090305.eA935W900472@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Warner Losh , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The shared /bin and /sbin bikeshed In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2000 18:48:39 PST." <20001108184838.L5112@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 19:05:32 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > What should I call the option? > > > > I'm thinking SLASHED_SHARED, but that's a horrible name. > > > > I've already rejected DANGEROUS_SBIN_BIN_SHARED_OPTION as being too > > long NO_STATIC_BINARIES NO_STATIC_LIBRARIES (and obviously NOPROFILE -> NO_PROFILED_LIBRARIES with a hook to force people to change) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message