Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 01:46:50 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/gnu/lib Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Message-ID: <20020516014650.A41621@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020516055741.GA26715@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:57:41AM %2B0300 References: <200205151629.g4FGTj062213@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020515150513.A14077@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020516055741.GA26715@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:57:41AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Log: > > > Make sure to not yet build the GNU C++, but still allow > > > for the C++ progs to be built with e.g. an old compiler, > > > CXX=/usr/bin/c++, for the time being. > > > > Please back this out. You are removing the ability to use an external > > C++ compiler. > There's no reason to back this out, it does not break anything listed > below. Have you actually looked at the diffs? Yes I did look at the diffs. What C++ compiler do we have that is named "c++" other than the system one? Certainly none of the GCC ports I > The point was to say that it's now possible to use CXX=/foo/path/c++, What "c++" command is this you envision? > Makefile.inc1 takes care of building "gperf" in bootstrap-tools, so > in a normal bootstrapping sequence no special hacks are necessary. Gperf is written in C++. If you have no system C++ compiler and CXX is set to its stock value; how are you going to build gperf? We experience this in the Sparc64 world where we never had a 2.95 system compiler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020516014650.A41621>