From owner-cvs-all Thu May 16 1:55:49 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A6B37B406; Thu, 16 May 2002 01:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4G8kofg042099; Thu, 16 May 2002 01:46:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4G8koQx042098; Thu, 16 May 2002 01:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 01:46:50 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/gnu/lib Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Message-ID: <20020516014650.A41621@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200205151629.g4FGTj062213@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020515150513.A14077@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020516055741.GA26715@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020516055741.GA26715@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:57:41AM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:57:41AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Log: > > > Make sure to not yet build the GNU C++, but still allow > > > for the C++ progs to be built with e.g. an old compiler, > > > CXX=/usr/bin/c++, for the time being. > > > > Please back this out. You are removing the ability to use an external > > C++ compiler. > There's no reason to back this out, it does not break anything listed > below. Have you actually looked at the diffs? Yes I did look at the diffs. What C++ compiler do we have that is named "c++" other than the system one? Certainly none of the GCC ports I > The point was to say that it's now possible to use CXX=/foo/path/c++, What "c++" command is this you envision? > Makefile.inc1 takes care of building "gperf" in bootstrap-tools, so > in a normal bootstrapping sequence no special hacks are necessary. Gperf is written in C++. If you have no system C++ compiler and CXX is set to its stock value; how are you going to build gperf? We experience this in the Sparc64 world where we never had a 2.95 system compiler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message