Date: 08 Apr 2002 14:49:04 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.c Message-ID: <xzpg026pd8f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020408110123.GB68318@sunbay.com> References: <200204072043.g37KhRi76699@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020408101138.GA68318@sunbay.com> <xzp1ydqqyx6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020408110123.GB68318@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes: > You're right. I forgot to relink pam_ssh.so library, and the diff was > against the wrong revision. I will still commit the "const poisoning" > patch to libutil, as the impact turned out to be really low. Thanks, const poisoning is a Good Thing [tm]. BTW, could you try to figure out a way we can split up the libpam build so the modules can depend on libpam.so? What I'd like is: 1) build static modules 2) build static and dynamic libpam 3) build dynamic modules (with dependency on libpam.so) or 1) build dynamic libpam 2) build modules (with dependency on libpam.so) 3) build static libpam or something similar. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg026pd8f.fsf>