From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 28 03:17:19 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B928D16A4BF
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 03:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za
	[196.31.7.201])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C6343F93
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 03:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net)
Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.22)
	id 19sJq6-000MTn-FD; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:17:14 +0200
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:17:14 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To: "Branko F. Grac(nar" <bfg@noviforum.si>
Message-ID: <20030828101714.GF83970@starjuice.net>
Mail-Followup-To: "Branko F. Grac(nar" <bfg@noviforum.si>,
	freebsd-java@freebsd.org
References: <20030828090512.GB83970@starjuice.net>
	<20030828090852.GC83970@starjuice.net>
	<20030828094833.GA82970@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <3F4DD228.20202@noviforum.si>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F4DD228.20202@noviforum.si>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Windows 2000 "Advanced" Server
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:17:19 -0000

On (2003/08/28 11:58), "Branko F. Grac(nar" wrote:

> $ time java TestThreads 50000 0
> TestThreads: successfully fired 50000 threads
> TestThreads: waited 0 milliseconds for all threads to complete
> 
> real    0m20.173s
> user    0m16.739s
> sys     0m1.909s
> 
> ... which 2478,56 threads/second.

These are not meaningful numbers.  The program wasn't designed to test
thread instantiation performance, and is pretty much guaranteed to do a
shit job of it. :-)

You need enough sleep time to ensure that all the threads are active at
once.

Ciao,
Sheldon.