From owner-freebsd-net Wed Nov 1 10:51:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC0537B4C5 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 10:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eA1Ipan32189; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:51:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA97759; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:51:35 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011011851.LAA97759@harmony.village.org> To: Luigi Rizzo Subject: Re: Traffic throttling Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:41:47 PST." <200011011841.KAA14837@iguana.aciri.org> References: <200011011841.KAA14837@iguana.aciri.org> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 11:51:35 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <200011011841.KAA14837@iguana.aciri.org> Luigi Rizzo writes: : - when your ISP will realize that the 5percentile of the samples : really accounts for 90% of your total traffic, i suppose : they will find some way to change your contract :) Given the number of customers that they have, and given that we're still maxed out at 256k and shooting for 32k, I think we're ok. If we were maxed out 5% of the time at 256k and 95% of the time at 32k, we'd still only have 43k or less average. The ISP deals in OC3s like they were cheap or something. We're mostly interested in keeping from having to pay double for 64k service unless we make the decision to have that level of service. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message