Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:34:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Cc:arch"@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Subject: Re: ports.conf Message-ID: <20010824143444.B83171@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010823143844.A18197@dragon.nuxi.com>; from dev-null@NUXI.com on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:38:44PM -0700 References: <20010823210729.A95484@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010823135941.B4003@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010824001737.B1714@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010823143844.A18197@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:38:44PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:17:37AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > I think he meant 'maintained in the ports/ tree' just as make.conf > > is 'maintained in the src/ tree', that is, there is a src/etc/make.conf > > file with evolving defaults. Yes, ports.conf should probably live > > in /etc or some such place, but I, too, think that it should be > > maintained in the ports tree, quite possibly in ports/Mk/. >=20 > How are you suggesting ports.conf get into /etc? A `make world' cannot > depend on having a populated /usr/ports/Mk. Same way /etc/make.conf gets into /etc. Kris --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7hshzWry0BWjoQKURAp4tAKCjqe5JPmafMzKsG8Fn8B6nUgBpJwCeIsr0 WPoXJc7lHEWQEIiiIR+w9ic= =00ks -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824143444.B83171>