From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Jun 11 19:28:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B20ED8D4B5 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A7574267 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-lists@klop.ws) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dK8XV-0006AP-MJ for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:28:46 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deorbiting armv4 and armv5 support References: Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 21:28:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (FreeBSD) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: 0.5 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_60 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Scan-Signature: a8ecdd0179e5342c74548fafd5461917 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:28:55 -0000 On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 22:22:51 +0200, Warner Losh wrote: > Greetings, > > The pmap in armv4/5 has been broken for years at this point. It basically > works, but has issues with unaligned buffers. Since these have remained > unfixed for a long time, and most of the main ARM developers have given > up > trying to fix it, I think it would be best to retire the support rather > than waste people's time that seem to be working only to discover after a > lot of effort that it's busted. > > Since the consensus at the FreeBSD developer's summit appeared to be > 'let's > let it go'. It would remove the TARGET_ARCH arm and armeb. armv6 would > remain unaffected (though see a parallel thread). > > Warner What branches are you talking about? Regards, Ronald.