From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Wed Feb 22 08:32:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E86CE9D5D; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F321305; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:32:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 690977EE1; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:32:09 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Bart??omiej Rutkowski Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Eric Badger , src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r314036 - head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/scripts Message-ID: <20170222083209.GA43001@FreeBSD.org> References: <201702210937.v1L9bY6V093836@repo.freebsd.org> <28a4cf5e-2edd-3e30-9ecd-817f886e9ea3@FreeBSD.org> <20170221144002.GA87822@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:32:10 -0000 On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:56:52AM +0000, Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote: > These options have been around forever, used by a lot of users (once they > got to know those even exist) and seem to cause no issues. However, despite > that, and numerous discussions and mail threads over the years, we've > struggled to enable them I presume they were not enabled by default for some reasons? A quick summary of those reasons would be helpful. :-) > and, as you can se, we even struggle to present and make them available > via installer. The question was not about whether to make them available, it was about turning them all on by default. ./danfe