Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:45:56 -0300 From: Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Sergey Vinogradov <boogie@lazybytes.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base) Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0909221045q6dfa1affv4955b5b51107f514@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <e7db6d980909221033h629936d7yc7d27db0bdc24dee@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> <19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com> <e7db6d980909221033h629936d7yc7d27db0bdc24dee@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/22/09, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... and what about sendmail?? >> couldn't it be easily replaced by DMA >> >> Regards >> Gonzalo > > I just went and had a quick at dma's info. It looks almost exactly > like what I've been saying for ages we should have in the base instead > of a heavyweight MTA. > > "It accepts mails from locally > installed Mail User Agents (MUA) and delivers the mails either locally > or to a remote destination. Remote delivery includes several features > like TLS/SSL support and SMTP authentication." > Yes ... that's exactly I'm suggesting it. =D Regards Gonzalo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19e9a5dc0909221045q6dfa1affv4955b5b51107f514>