From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 11:37:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B0C16A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06FE43D3F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:37:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2HJbloP009264; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:37:47 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040317023908.GA56755@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040314210709.GA6482@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl> <20040315161833.GA10855@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040317023908.GA56755@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:37:46 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reasons for 64-bTT & DHCP import X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:37:48 -0000 At 6:39 PM -0800 3/16/04, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Tue, Mar 16, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > >> Hmm. The version in ports seemed to work fairly reliably in > > my limited testing. The version in the base system almost > > never worked for me, so I assumed they were different. > >It's possible the base system version has an incorrect configuration >file; these are typically generated statically by the person who >does the import, so they can sometimes become stale when new >versions are imported, or perhaps a sparc64 version was never >imported in the first place. Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >I committed a ton of patches to the port last night, including >one that should fix the 64-bit time_t issue. This is excellent to see. Thanks! Hopefully that will go a long way to fixing the problems that people are seeing, and then we can get the same fixes into the base-system version. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu