From owner-cvs-all Fri Dec 14 3:43:27 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from white.imgsrc.co.jp (ns.imgsrc.co.jp [210.226.20.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E014537B405; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 03:43:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2:290:27ff:fe98:c0b7]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50AC24D3A; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:43:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp (waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2:230:48ff:fe41:161b]) by black.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1750FD1401; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:43:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:43:08 +0900 Message-ID: <7mk7vqauyb.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/comms Makefile ports/comms/conserver-com Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/comms/conserver-com/files patch-conserver.rc In-Reply-To: <20011210005040.Q23826@squall.waterspout.com> References: <200112091440.fB9EeD726698@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011209134457.A23826@squall.waterspout.com> <7melm4doju.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20011210005040.Q23826@squall.waterspout.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:50:40 -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > Hmm, this conserver is forked from 5.21-Beta version of conserver. > > Our comms/conserver is imported at 5.21-Beta so I think > > comms/conserver and comms/conserver-com are very different program. > > Doesn't matter if they were forked a long time ago. If they are > even mildly related, the port must be repocopied. Does this need > to be made clear in the Committers' Handbook? Hmm. Until now, I supposed why repocopy is required is to keep history. The history of this conserver-com itself is not shared with conserver's one in the period after conserver is ported to the FreeBSD's Ports Collection. Anyway, I appreciate if you clarify "when we should repocopy". -- Jun Kuriyama // IMG SRC, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message